Talk:Hans Clemens
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 01:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Hans Clemens, a German tenor, performed 197 times at the Metropolitan Opera, including a 1936 broadcast as David in Wagner's Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg? Source: [1] for the recording, and others
- Reviewed: to come
Created by 4meter4 (talk) and Gerda Arendt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 19:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC).
- Does not satisfy the "newness" requirement. It was created on 28 October with 2,592 characters of narrative text. It was not nominated until 10 November -- 13 days later. Thus it is substantially late by about two-fold under eligibility criteria #1a. Nor has there been a 5x expansion (not even 2x) to bring it under criteria #1b. Nor was it moved from draft namespace so as to qualify under #1c. I tried to find a reason to say "yes" but all indicators say "no". If I missed something, please let me know. Cbl62 (talk) 15:50, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, my bad. I got to know it on 3 November (my talk) and didn't check that it wasn't created that day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Does not satisfy the "newness" requirement. It was created on 28 October with 2,592 characters of narrative text. It was not nominated until 10 November -- 13 days later. Thus it is substantially late by about two-fold under eligibility criteria #1a. Nor has there been a 5x expansion (not even 2x) to bring it under criteria #1b. Nor was it moved from draft namespace so as to qualify under #1c. I tried to find a reason to say "yes" but all indicators say "no". If I missed something, please let me know. Cbl62 (talk) 15:50, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- No problem, Gerda. As I said, I tried to find a way to "yes" but couldn't get there. Cbl62 (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)